RSS

Hamden Rite-Aid Sells

rite-aidCostar - April 13, 2009

An investor taking title as Rende LLC acquired the Rite-Aid store at 2175 Dixwell Ave. in Hamden, CT, from Sovereign RA 2 LLC for a little more than $3 million, or $135 per square foot.

The 22,522-square-foot retail building was built in 2002. Rite-Aid fully occupies the property, which was previously a Brooks drugstore.

Kase Abusharkh of Sperry Van Ness represented the seller.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
,

7 Comments For This Post

  1. Jose Says:

    You are doing an outstanding job with propertyjump.com! It’s inforamtive, fresh and upbeat.

    Regarding this sale, was it possible that what was acquired was a ground lease only? Seems to be a low price/SF even for a Rite Aid yet one at 22,500SF and built in 2002.

  2. noah Says:

    Thanks.. Buying a Rite-Aid right now is high risk beacause of their financial position. A buyer should get a high return beacuse of this. Check out this article -http://www.propertyjump.com/?p=371 . Seems like there is a lot of them on the market now

  3. Jose Says:

    Agreed on how the Rite Aid properties are stacking up Noah. But what does the broker report or deed say whether it was for the Land and Building or just a ground lease?

    Otherwise at a conceptual 9% cap rate and at $135/SF overall SP it’s suggesting a base rent NNN in the range of $12/SF +/-? Is that reasonable?

    Anyone close to this sale property care to weigh in?

  4. noah Says:

    according to costar it was the land and building. If the rent was $12 SF NNN that would be very low for that location. I just did a retail lease at a less busy location for $20 SF NNN

  5. KrisBelucci Says:

    Hi, good post. I have been wondering about this issue,so thanks for posting.

  6. GarykPatton Says:

    Hi. I like the way you write. Will you post some more articles?

  7. L Lapierre Says:

    Does anyone have 2006 and 2007 cap data for the Danbury area for retail structures containing from 10,000 to 18,000 sq feet?
    thanks in advance.

Leave a Reply